Variety in work assignment means designing jobs and rotas so that no one does the same narrow task indefinitely, and so that each person’s work has some range of skill, a visible result, a purpose they can see and a say in how it is done. Vary what can safely be varied, and where a job cannot be rotated, give the person other forms of variety, support and recognition.

Variety in work assignment is the design of tasks so that work stays engaging and sustainable over long periods.

The Parent’s Claim

The parent article says that doing the same task every day accelerates burnout regardless of the task’s difficulty, and recommends rotating assignments where skill allows, cross-training so rotation is possible, and giving specialists who cannot rotate other forms of variety, support and recognition. The first statement is a reasonable general expectation, though “accelerates” and “regardless of difficulty” are stronger than I can point to a source for. What can be said is that repetitive, narrow work with no say and no visible result is a frequent finding in studies of poor job quality.

A Way To Think About Job Design

The job characteristics model, proposed by J. Richard Hackman and Greg Oldham in the 1970s, describes five features of a job that tend to make it motivating: variety of skills used, completing a whole identifiable piece of work, significance for other people, autonomy, and feedback on results. (From memory; I have not rechecked the original or the empirical support, which is mixed, and the work was done in factories and offices.) It is a convenient checklist for a community, whatever its scientific status, because each point is something a rota planner can change:

  • Skill variety. Can the person do more than one kind of thing in a week?
  • Whole task. Do they see the result of what they begin, for example from seed to harvest or from raw hide to boot?
  • Significance. Do they know who the work is for and why it matters? See Value of Work.
  • Autonomy. Can they decide how to do it, within safe limits?
  • Feedback. Do they find out how it went?

Ways To Add Variety

Rotate across tasks. See Rest Days & Rotation and Labor Rotation.

Enlarge the job. Give the person the whole sequence in place of one step. A cook who also helps with gathering sees the chain.

Pair people. A pair shares a heavy job and the conversation that goes with it. Pairs also teach.

Add learning. Let a person take on a part of a new skill. This ties to the community’s wider training, see Training Pipeline.

Offer choice. Let people choose among comparable jobs for the week.

Mix indoor and outdoor, solitary and social, heavy and light. Over a week, not necessarily a day.

What Limits Variety

  • Skill and safety. Some work must stay with trained people. See Essential Roles and Minimum Viable Specialization.
  • Learning cost. A person moved to a new task is slower for a while. A rota that churns constantly gives up efficiency.
  • Individual preference. Some people like steady routine and find rotation stressful. Ask rather than assume.
  • Scarce labour. A small community may have too few people to rotate much.

Method: Reviewing The Rota For Variety

Step 1: List each person’s week. What they actually do, from the rota and from asking.

Step 2: Mark the stuck ones. Anyone doing one narrow thing for a long time, particularly a hard or dull one.

Step 3: Look for a safe change. A swap, a pairing or an added task.

Step 4: Provide for those who cannot move. Recognition, a second person for relief, a chance to teach, a change of setting. See Scaling Specialization.

Step 5: Ask people. “What would make this work better for you?” Their answers will include things you have not thought of.

Step 6: Watch for unfair patterns. If the dullest or hardest tasks fall on the same group (newcomers, women, the young, the lowly), the rota is unfair and morale will suffer. See Handling Freeloaders for the opposite problem, and Division of Labor.

Common Mistakes

  • Rotating for the sake of it. Churn without purpose costs learning.
  • Giving variety to the favoured. Interesting tasks go to the leader’s friends.
  • Removing autonomy while adding variety. Variety without a say is not enough.
  • Ignoring the work that cannot change. Someone has to haul water every day; make it good work as far as possible.

What’s Next